>.>;;; Unless someone decides to pull the plug on all that stuff (the video game not included in that since Activision pretty much did that).

I am not too worry about the video game. They put so much effort into making it with TR making a new engine for the game, getting the original guys to come in and do voice overs for their roles again which is very hard to do now-a-days. I have not seen James Earl Jones reprising his role as Darth Vader in any recent Star Wars games. Even in Force Unleashed.

I think too much time, effort, and money went into GB the game for it to be just dropped from existence. That is a waste even by Sony's standards and they are wealthy.

Scott Sommer;129883
I am not too worry about the video game. They put so much effort into making it with TR making a new engine for the game, getting the original guys to come in and do voice overs for their roles again which is very hard to do now-a-days. I have not seen James Earl Jones reprising his role as Darth Vader in any recent Star Wars games. Even in Force Unleashed.

I think too much time, effort, and money went into GB the game for it to be just dropped from existence. That is a waste even by Sony's standards and they are wealthy.

Don't get to excited there, there's always a very slim chance that as complete as the game is, they could still very well drop it.

Jonathan Archer;129897
Don't get to excited there, there's always a very slim chance that as complete as the game is, they could still very well drop it.

Possible, but not very likely. So being excited is a good thing, not bad.

I am going to be positive from now on, not negative

I kinda lost all my positive when Craptivision pulled the plug as the game's publisher, and the fact that we've still yet to hear from Sony about a new publisher doesn't help.

Alright Jonathan, we've gotten that you don't like Activision and the decision they made.

http://kotaku.com/5062063/thq-picks-up-50-cent-off-the-ground?cpage=1&sort=asc#viewcomments

=/ There is no justice. 50 gets a publisher and yet, Ghostbusters doesn't, wtf?

Yourbigpalal, you are far better off reading the necronomicon then trying to figure out Activision's logic in deciding to not publish the game, plus you get to go nicely insane and all sorts of dark and ancient things go after you, with trying to figure out activision's logic, you just a headache.

Lord_Kane;129950
Yourbigpalal, you are far better off reading the necronomicon then trying to figure out Activision's logic in deciding to not publish the game, plus you get to go nicely insane and all sorts of dark and ancient things go after you, with trying to figure out activision's logic, you just a headache.

Plus you can kill things with a boomstick and a chainsaw…..Groovy

Jonathan Archer;129945
http://kotaku.com/5062063/thq-picks-up-50-cent-off-the-ground?cpage=1&sort=asc#viewcomments

=/ There is no justice. 50 gets a publisher and yet, Ghostbusters doesn't, wtf?

In all fairness the story sound ridiculous, but the graphics are sick! I have no interest in 50 and I'm only a casual shooter fan and I'm interested.

That being said, I think it's safe to say Ghostbusters will be fine if that game is being picked up. And trust me it'll be much bigger news on the internets when the GBTVG is announced.